Is there an objective standard of taste? Essay -- Art, Aesthetic Princi

In Aesthetics, it is thought that in order to show that a work of subterfuge is truly great, it is required that an assessment of aesthetical value must be made (Graham, 2001). Therefore, it can be seen as important that such criteria of can be defined in order to make such an assessment. In this essay, I shall argue that it is not possible for there to be an accusatory standard of test that can be defined through a set of binding aesthetic principles that can be used to judge value of artistic works. Rather, than an objective standard of grasp can exist without aesthetic rules or principles. This shall be done by first examining Humes seminal work Of the standard of taste (Hume, SOT). Firstly Humes idea of agreeableness of a work art shall be addressed, and how the idea of the test of time can result in consent of in aesthetic judgement as evidence that there can be an objective standard for aesthetic judgement. This shall be confirmed by examining Humes non-cognitivist accou nt of aesthetic judgement proposing that no properties of objects can make them viable candidates for aesthetic evaluation, only the immediate and spontaneous reactions that they can evoke from us can. afterward this has been established it will then be shown that due to the shared nature of the human species, such aesthetic sentiments can display reasonable uniformity. Although it will convey already been established that a uniformity of taste exists, it will be discussed how aesthetic sentiments can be improved by a sound concord of what is being appreciated, as it is possible for some aesthetic judgments to be better than others, through aesthetic judgment of individuals that Hume regards as being good critics, who have well-tuned aesthetic sensibilit... ... (1963)The abbreviations and texts cited above are as followsTA Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd ed. revised by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford Clarendon Press, (1975)SOTOf the Standard of Taste, in, The Ph ilosophical Works of David Hume, edited by T. H. Green and T. H. Grose. 4 volumes, London Longman, Green, 1874-75. Page references above to individual essays are to volume 3 of this edition. Web Articles usedZangwill, Nick, Aesthetic Judgment, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2006 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), uniform resource locator = .Gracyk, Ted, Humes Aesthetics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2006 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = .