Evaluating the Impact of Tourism in England Essay -- UK, Britain

Tourist CountDuring our land to Ashridge Estate, we carried a tourist count on two honey hole locations known as Bridgewater Monument and Ivinghoe Beacon. 1 come in of the 4 groups that visited Ashridge carried out the tourist count as we did not want to hassle the tourists. A member from the group stood at an area in both locations and took a count of the amount of teen come alongrs, adults, OAPs, family groups and children there were. The instruction was then tallied onto a t fitted. From this, we entrust compare the results collected to previous years (2004-2005). The comparison will be social occasionful as it will allow us to analyse the information to consume whether there is a correlation between the result of touristry and the hypothesis. If the number of tourists has decreased, then good less damage done to the wildlife and surround. However, if the number of tourists increased, it may also suggest that the negative impacts baffle likewise increased. or so of the negative impacts may be nerve tract erosion more tourists use the footpath resulting in more damage, Littering animals may eat the litter which could victimize them and also the snap/noise pollution created via tourist transportation affects the air quality and environment of the local wildlife.As we took the tourist count, we categorized the tourists into age groups. The reason for this was to see which age group was more likely to strike a negative impact in Ashridge. Children and teenagers for example tend to be more energetic in comparison to OAPs, doing more active activities that could ruin the local wildlife and environment e.g. football sports. Whilst OAPs are more still and less energetic doing activities that are less likely to harm the wildlife and environment e.g. bird watching. So... ...to see whether they were change by tourism. On the sketch we took exact annotations to help us visualize the problems we saw such as footpath erosion, debris materials scattered , deep rutted soil and other negative impacts. From this we could see the difference in both footpaths ((un)managed) to see which one was more affected by tourism. The problem with the field sketches was that whilst we were drawing, it was really windy which subsequently put off us, so there may have been some mistakes. Also, some of the pupils from the groups represent it difficult to draw what they saw, so the sketches may also not have been accurate and reliable.We could improve our drawings by taking a camera to stimulate accurate photos that will give us reliable results. From the pictures we would be able to recall the features of the footpaths we saw in order to help our fieldwork.